October 29, 2011 E-MAIL PRINT

Return to glory?

Clarkson puts its future in the hands of Casey Jones and his ability to attract top talent to Potsdam

by Adam Wodon/Web Editor

Coach Casey Jones points Clarkson toward an improved future. (photo: Clarkson Athletics)

Coach Casey Jones points Clarkson toward an improved future. (photo: Clarkson Athletics)

MORE IMAGES     previous   next    start over

With Clarkson coming off the worst three-year stretch in its 90-year history of men’s hockey, the school decided to fire eight-year head coach George Roll.

He was replaced in May by Casey Jones, a one-time Clarkson assistant and Cornell forward, who went on to successful assistant coaching stints at Ohio State and, most recently, his alma mater.

Few doubt Jones’ ability to right the ship in Potsdam, N.Y. His recruiting prowess is well-known, he has built a solid staff and he knows the area.

But questions pervade the Golden Knights’ program as the new season approaches. First and foremost, can anyone get Clarkson back to the heights of prominence last seen — consistently — in the 1990s? And was firing Roll — coming six weeks after the season ended — the right thing to do?

The latter question is not Jones’ to worry about. The former one is.

Roll took over a program in disarray, and led a comeback that included back-to-back NCAA tournament appearances in 2007 and ’08, including one win. Things went south again quickly, but Roll seemingly had earned the right to turn things back around again.

Last season, the team played well in the first half but faltered down the stretch, which may have sealed Roll’s fate. There was a lot of hue and cry from fans and alumni, dissatisfied with the three consecutive losing seasons. And with Roll’s contract left to expire — after a number of hollow assurances during the season — he was cast aside.

Clarkson athletic director Steve Yianoukos sidestepped most direct questions about the situation.

Agree with the decision or not, it certainly wasn’t artfully handled. Clarkson may simply be in and up-and-down cycle like many other programs in the ECAC, such as Colgate and St. Lawrence, two non-Ivy ECAC schools with successful programs that nevertheless have seen their share of down years.

“Clarkson needs to face the reality that it’s not the ’90s anymore,” one ECAC insider said. “Things are different; Ivy League financial-aid packages make them so much more competitive, and major junior is winning recruiting battles all over hockey.”

Clarkson’s administration, at least, isn’t buying into this, and clearly laid the blame at Roll’s feet.

Jones, therefore, enters into this landscape pressured with meeting those high expectations. Of course, he said he welcomes the challenge but acknowledges the difficulty.

“It’s harder, no question. But we’ll have to recruit and get people to be excited about Clarkson,” Jones said. “But our goal is not just to recruit well but to develop well. We have to make our players better.

“That was a focal point of putting my staff together. We’ll recruit, but we don’t want to overlook development. That’s a separating factor.”

The staff is new, beginning with former Clarkson defenseman Phil Roy, who was plucked from Merrimack’s staff.

“I went after Phil,” Jones said. “I recruited him when I was a coach here. He’s passionate about Clarkson. I thought it was a natural fit for our staff. He’s a high-energy guy, and he’s going to be a positional coach for the defense. (Second assistant) Andy (Jones, no relation) is someone we dipped into the USHL for. He’s well-respected. In my dealings with him over time while out recruiting players, I found him to be analytical; he thinks things out.

“When you’re an assistant and you’re in the trenches recruiting, you’re around and connecting with a lot of guys on the road. You see how they carry themselves. You get a real good feel for guys.”

The pressure is not just at Clarkson. There were eight coaching changes this offseason in Division 1 hockey — out of just 59 schools — as more programs put an emphasis on winning, and doing it quickly and consistently. This kind of atmosphere has changed the recruiting landscape.

“We’re the only sport that has a gentleman’s agreement (with verbal commitments),” Jones said. “All the other sports are hardcore. … It’s getting further and further away from that.

“A lot of programs are being held to a standard to win. Guys do what they have to do to get it done.”

That’s not all that has changed it, Jones said. College hockey made a lot of inroads on major junior hockey over the years, but in the past five years, those inroads have gone the other way, and fast. Major junior teams are winning the recruiting battles and players are leaving college hockey — or backing out of previous commitments — left and right.

In Clarkson’s sphere of influence, just south of Ontario, that issue is heightened. Jones said recruiting against major junior is a bigger concern to him than recruiting against other college teams.

Amid all of this, Jones sees hope — or else he wouldn’t have left his alma mater. Especially when he leaves behind a recruiting class that’s considered to be one of the best in the East.

“My goal was to be a head coach,” Jones said. “There was no hesitation from that perspective. You forge relationships (with players). That’s the hardest part of changing jobs. A lot of kids make those commitments, (and) they realize it’s a business after that.”

“I wanted to be at a place I knew my family would like. You have to put in the long hours to do the job correctly, so you want to be somewhere that you can be successful. Clarkson presents that.”

Even in recruiting, there is still plenty Clarkson can do.

“Recruiting is still regional. There’s still a chance to get players in close proximity to Clarkson. That will never change,” Jones said. “It’s a fantastic opportunity here. We want to make our development model something the kids want to be a part of.”

Though playing entirely with Roll’s recruits, the cupboard was not left bare. There are upperclassmen that have been expected to produce, and can still do so. And the recruiting class was solid.

“We all have the same goal: We want to get things going in the right direction. And by the looks of it right now, hopefully we can pull it off,” Clarkson senior goalie Paul Karpowich said. “We want to get Cheel (Arena) back to being a tough place to play. We’re going to come out right off the bat and take control of every game.”

Said Jones: “As long as these kids are committed to themselves, I don’t see why they can’t have success this year. We’ll see how committed they are. There’s some ballplayers there. We’ll see how committed they are to work hard.”

This article originally appeared in the October 2011 issue of New York Hockey Journal. Adam Wodon can be reached at awodon@nyhockeyjournal.com

E-MAIL PRINT